以下是彼得福纳吉教授在2003年发表的一篇论文里的一段节选，彼得福纳吉本人是安娜弗洛伊德中心的精神分析师，KCL临床心理学教授，精神分析里味道最对，实证依据最多的的心智化理论的创始人。
「Our aim should be to assist the movement of psychoanalysis toward science. In order to ensure a future for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic therapies within psychiatry, psychoanalytic practitioners must change their attitude in the direction of a more systematic outlook. This attitude shift would be characterized by several components: a) The evidence base of psychoanalysis should be strengthened by adopting additional data-gathering methods that are now widely available in biological and social science. New evidence may assist psychoanalysts in resolving theoretical differences, a feat which the current database of predominantly anecdotal clinical accounts have not been capable of achieving. b) The logic of psychoanalytic discourse would need to change from its overdependence on rhetoric and global constructs to using specific constructs that allow for cumulative data-gathering. c) Flaws in psychoanalytic scientific reasoning, such as failures to consider alternative accounts for observations (beyond that favored by the author), should be overcome and in particular, the issue of genetic and social influence should be approached with increased sophistication. d) The isolation of psychoanalysis should be replaced by active collaboration with other mental health disciplines. Instead of fearing that fields adjacent to psychoanalysis might destroy the unique insights offered by clinical work, we need to embrace the rapidly evolving 'knowledge chain' focused at different levels of the study of brain-behavior relationship, which, as Kandel (7,79) points out, may be the only route to the preservation of the hard won insights of psychoanalysis.」 [1]
我就不翻译了，大家可以自行用翻译软件翻译一下。按我总结，就十六个字「科学大势，浩浩荡荡；顺之者昌，逆之者亡。」
什么时候没有实证研究依据变成傲慢和自恋的理由了，你到底是宗教还是治疗？
换句话说，这个问题的本质是，绝大多数的国内心理咨询师，有没有接受过系统的，有科学和实证依据的临床训练？
不是某个大师拍脑门的那种大师班，是经过专业委员会审核的，基于学历教育的规范的临床培训。
没记错的话，今年学会才出来培训大纲吧？
参考
- ^https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525087/
