以下是彼得福納吉教授在2003年發表的一篇論文裏的一段節選，彼得福納吉本人是安娜佛洛伊德中心的精神分析師，KCL臨床心理學教授，精神分析裏味道最對，實證依據最多的的心智化理論的創始人。
「Our aim should be to assist the movement of psychoanalysis toward science. In order to ensure a future for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic therapies within psychiatry, psychoanalytic practitioners must change their attitude in the direction of a more systematic outlook. This attitude shift would be characterized by several components: a) The evidence base of psychoanalysis should be strengthened by adopting additional data-gathering methods that are now widely available in biological and social science. New evidence may assist psychoanalysts in resolving theoretical differences, a feat which the current database of predominantly anecdotal clinical accounts have not been capable of achieving. b) The logic of psychoanalytic discourse would need to change from its overdependence on rhetoric and global constructs to using specific constructs that allow for cumulative data-gathering. c) Flaws in psychoanalytic scientific reasoning, such as failures to consider alternative accounts for observations (beyond that favored by the author), should be overcome and in particular, the issue of genetic and social influence should be approached with increased sophistication. d) The isolation of psychoanalysis should be replaced by active collaboration with other mental health disciplines. Instead of fearing that fields adjacent to psychoanalysis might destroy the unique insights offered by clinical work, we need to embrace the rapidly evolving 'knowledge chain' focused at different levels of the study of brain-behavior relationship, which, as Kandel (7,79) points out, may be the only route to the preservation of the hard won insights of psychoanalysis.」 [1]
我就不轉譯了，大家可以自行用轉譯軟體轉譯一下。按我總結，就十六個字「科學大勢，浩浩蕩蕩；順之者昌，逆之者亡。」
什麽時候沒有實證研究依據變成傲慢和自戀的理由了，你到底是宗教還是治療？
換句話說，這個問題的本質是，絕大多數的國內心理咨詢師，有沒有接受過系統的，有科學和實證依據的臨床訓練？
不是某個大師拍腦門的那種大師班，是經過專業委員會稽核的，基於學歷教育的規範的臨床培訓。
沒記錯的話，今年學會才出來培訓大綱吧？
參考
- ^https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525087/
